Both are good tools though: If you already have a license for forklift and it works for you I would stick to it. I find Transnit simpler, cleaner, and easier to use it’s less cluttered. but ultimately it’s a matter of preference. NetDrive alternatives are mainly Cloud Storage. Other great apps like NetDrive are RaiDrive, Koofr, odrive and Air Explorer. The best NetDrive alternative is Cyberduck, which is both free and Open Source. I prefer Transmit because it is much more polished and has a few interesting features, like deeply configurable sync, droplets, etc. There are more than 25 alternatives to NetDrive for a variety of platforms, including Windows, Mac, Web-based, Linux and Android apps. I don’t know if Forklift supports server-side copy I haven’t used it in years. However, whether Transmit will do server-side copy, or download file from one bucket to the local machine and then upload to the other bucket will depend on whether the server (S3 gateway in this case) supports required API (CopyObject in this case). You can, of course, open one bucket in one pane, and the other bucket in the other, and copy by dragging or copy paste. If not - CyberDuck shall do.įirstly, using transmit or forklift can I move files and folders between buckets? My personal choice is Panic’s Transmit, if you need to use it frequently. This allows to use native mounting tools on macOS and thus avoid kernel extensions: rclone, for example, relies on FUSE kext to implement filesystem, but going forward kernel extensions are discouraged on most OSes that take security and stability seriously. The downsize would be lack of streaming support - the file needs to be downloaded in its entirety before it can be open by applications, this kills some scenarios like media file streaming.Īn example of the latter will be MountainDuck - it launches local NFS server and serves data via virtual NFS shares. It is, however, pretty rough in terms of UI polish and stability. If you want to mount the storj bucket (like rclone mount) you want the tool that either supports new FileProvider API on macOS or a tool that serves data via locally run file server.Īn example of the former would be StrongSync by ExpanDrive. without mounting) you can use Cyberduck (Free) or Panic Transmit (paid, but worth every penny). It can use storj via S3, and is hands down best cloud backup tools on macOS, and I’ve tried a lot of them over the years.įor sync between local folder and the bucket, and browsing the bucket in the app’s interface (I.e. Strongsync, an application developed by ExpanDrive, is the first application on the Mac to support this interface.Do you want to backup to storj, sync to storj, or mount the storj bucket locally?įor backup I recommend Arq7. With Apple deprecating Kernel Extensions, and making loading them much more onerous on Apple Silicon the path forward for accessing remote content in native local apps on the mac is the File Provider interface. macOS File Provider based SSHFS Strongsync - a macOS File Provider supporting SFTP Cloudmounter is a similar solution but more squarely designed at Mac. Mountain Duck is based on CyberDuck, a popular java-based file transfer client. CloudMounter and Mountain Duck are two popular examples of this type of solution. This NFS server translates the NFS commands into SFTP commands, so you can have an appearance of a local filesystem. Loopback server commerical solutionsĪnother style of implementing SSHFS is implementing a local NFS server that the operating system connects to. One caveat is that like many solutions, it relies on a kernel extension which has been deprecated by macOS and requires a reboot into recovery mode to reduce security level on newer Apple Silicon based macs. If you're looking for a free or open-source option, this is a good place to start. It is a relatively straightforward no-frills command-line appliation without any user interface, but it is well tested and used by many. The go-to opensource option is the port of SSHFS from Linux by macFUSE. Options for SSHFS on macOS Open-source SSHFS based on macFUSE The changes you make are immediately and securely synced out to the server over the SSH channel and you don't have to think twice after you hit the save button. Practically speaking that means you can copy and paste file from local to remote from within Finder, or edit files directly on the server using whatever tools you normally use like VS Code, Photoshop, even Microsoft office. Thankfully, there is a better way to interact with files on your server and that is using a SSHFS-type (SSH Filesystem) tool so you can interact with remote storage as if it was local storage on your machine. Manually transferring files that you're editing back and forth can turn into a cumbersome and repetitive task. When you're working with a remote server over SSH it's often the case you need to regularly edit files on that server.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |